BDI, CDI, MRI and BAS: computing the indices without inventing a universal convention.

SUPPORTED DECISIONCompute BDI and CDI with consistent units, then reject any MRI or BAS whose convention is not explicitly documented.

Evidence status

What was reproduced, and what it does not prove.

The versioned specification and the educational fixture were verified. The Python run reproduces BDI 80 and CDI 120, and rejects a null population or a share out of range. MRI and BAS remain deliberately unavailable without a convention.

  1. Technical specification of BDI and CDI, specification in French (opens in a new tab)

    v1, 31 August 2026 · CC BY 4.0 · specification in French · Method document written by marketing-mix.net. The figures are illustrative: they are not market measurements.

Key distinctions

Three conditions before calculating.

01

A relative base of 100

An index of 120 means 20% above the defined base, not absolute performance or causation.

02

Strictly comparable units

Sales, population, period and scope must be aligned. Mixing value, volume or areas invalidates the ratio.

03

MRI and BAS by local agreement

These acronyms can cover several methods. The exact formula and its source are part of the result, not of an appendix.

Method

Computing and interpreting without over-promising

  1. 01Define market, brand and category

    Record area, period, unit and source; the population share uses the same scope as the sales.

  2. 02Compute the relative shares

    BDI = brand sales share / population share × 100. CDI = category sales share / population share × 100.

  3. 03Read the two indices together

    BDI and CDI describe a configuration. On their own they do not say whether the gap comes from distribution, price, demand or competition.

  4. 04Document the proprietary indices

    For MRI or BAS, record formula, weightings, data, treatment of missing values, base, frequency and owner.

ORIGINAL ASSET

BDI and CDI calculator, MRI and BAS register

The calculator uses shares expressed in the same unit. MRI and BAS remain unavailable until their convention is documented.

Base-100 indicesBDI 80 · CDI 120

Descriptive result: it is neither an allocation recommendation nor causal proof.

MRIConvention required

Formula, base, period, source and interpretation.

BASConvention required

Dimensions, weightings, missing values and thresholds.

CSVDownload the index worksheet↓
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE · SIMULATED DATA

An under-developed brand in an over-developed category

01 · SITUATION

Illustrative example: an area represents 10% of the population, 8% of brand sales and 12% of category sales.

02 · CALCULATION

BDI = 8 / 10 × 100 = 80. CDI = 12 / 10 × 100 = 120.

03 · DECISION

The contrast warrants an investigation into availability, preference, price and competition. It proves neither a causal potential nor an optimal allocation.

Acceptance conditions

What must be true to act.

  1. 01

    Use the same area, period and unit for the numerator and the denominator.

  2. 02

    Show the source shares alongside the index so that the calculation is reproducible.

  3. 03

    Treat missing data as unavailable, never as zero.

  4. 04

    Reject an MRI or BAS without an explicit formula, base, source and weighting rule.

Limits

What this analysis does not prove.

  • BDI and CDI are descriptive and sensitive to the definition of the market and the population.
  • A base of 100 is neither a universal objective nor an automatic investment threshold.
  • MRI and BAS can be company or supplier conventions that are not comparable with each other.
  • These indices do not replace incremental analysis or financial brand measurement.

References

Works cited.

  1. Nielsen, Market development indices, principles of geographic analysis (opens in a new tab)
  2. Farris et al., Marketing Metrics, BDI and CDI definitions (opens in a new tab)